All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
YouTube Generation MAG
Julia G.'s article “YouTube Generation” made me wonder, Is the name really wrong? Yes, it is degrading, but our generation does spend endless amounts of time doing worthless things on the computer, though not all teens are addicted to the “mind-numbing stupidity.” I agree that our generation's name could be different. I've heard other labels that are not as degrading, such as the Electronic Generation and Cellular Age.
I give Julia kudos for voicing her opinion.
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 0 comments.